By Elizabeth Nelson
Now, what motive could Obama and the DOJ possibly have
with trying to strong arm the Ferguson Police Department and Police Chief Tom
Jackson over the release of the video that shows Michael Brown strong arm
robbing a retail clerk at Sam's Meat Market, stealing $48 dollars worth of
cigars, just moments before the shooting?
Holder’s
Justice Department attempted to suppress the release of the video in order to
promote the Trayvonization of Michael Brown...,
So, in order to give the appearance of an "innocent kid," just "walking home." But even Trayvon's past was rewritten by the DOJ and the media. His pot habit and selling it to his friends and classmates, excessive fighting, and selling of guns never made it to the light of day, did it? Nor did Zimmerman's broken nose and the injuries to the back of his head, because they were "intentionally suppressed" by prosecution, just as pertinent details of this young MAN'S life will never see the light of day. There will always be an agenda to push or to suppress, it seems, a base to pander to.
The Department of Justice urged Ferguson police not to release surveillance video purporting to show Michael Brown robbing a store shortly before he was shot and killed by police, arguing the footage would further inflame tensions in the St. Louis suburb that saw rioting and civil unrest in the wake of the teenager’s death.
So now, because we have a half-black president in Obama, every child in a bad neighborhood feels he can beat up grown, armed men, and get away with it, and even threaten the lives of our Police Officers?
Then suddenly, at the time their soul leaves their body, their community suddenly believes that this person has a "heart of gold" and is "innocent" even though the person laying on the ground was the very one that was just robbing a store, moments before the shooting and assaulting a cop?
Now we add insult to injury and I'm sure they aren't trying to give the Watts Riots a run for their money:
So, if being tried by the court of public opinion isn't bad enough, now we're calling criminals
"protesters" and saying it's their "First
Amendment Right" to destroy their neighborhood, terrorize
their neighbors, and destroy the dreams and lives of their friends and
neighbors like emotional terrorists. These people have become the looters victims, because they now no longer have a business or a job to go to, because they've
looted and destroyed the business they once called an income.
If I were any of those business owners, WHY on God's green earth
would I want to reopen a business in a community that showed me how much they
"appreciated" my business by not only robbing from me but burning
my livelihood down? NOT. So those employees have no one to thank
but their "peaceful protesting" friends and neighbors for
putting them on the welfare and unemployment line and stealing from
them too. Maybe that's why Michael Brown didn't learn that
valuable lesson, before he robbed a store or picked a fight with an armed
cop, because he wasn't taught it from the adults of the Village:
Actions have Consequences.
Update on "Peaceful Protests":
Remember that Meat Market that Michael Brown robbed?
Sam's Meat Market was trashed. Owner arrived (with his guns) to two looters inside. Talked them out. #Fergusonriot pic.twitter.com/tcxNGD2iSi
— Michael Calhoun (@michaelcalhoun) August 16, 2014
Welcome to ObamaNation
Store owners in #Ferguson say they're going to start defending themselves against looters. pic.twitter.com/YvP9xFEtA2
— Michael Calhoun (@michaelcalhoun) August 16, 2014
Looting Saturday - so much for "peaceful protests" let's just call them what they are, opportunistic criminals.
Wireless store looted. #Ferguson pic.twitter.com/7tv55S7p6O
— Michael Calhoun (@michaelcalhoun) August 16, 2014
People walking out with items. #Ferguson pic.twitter.com/mKZBshmYOB
— Michael Calhoun (@michaelcalhoun) August 16, 2014
It's actually dangerous for him to take photos, because reporters lives are being threatened now, not just policemen.
No comments:
Post a Comment