White House Intentionally Deletes from Their Vocabulary, Refusing to say, "Radical Islam" or "Islamic Terrorism"

By Elizabeth Nelson

Welcome to Obamanation, where we are told what we will and will not say, when combating terror. Now, when there is a terror event, like in Paris, "we will no longer say Radical Islam or Islamic Terrorist attack."

Press Secretary Josh Earnest defended President Obama and White House officials for refusing to describe the terrorist attacks in Paris as a consequence of radical Islamic terrorism.

Earnest explained to White House reporters during the press briefing that this is a question of “accuracy.”

“We want to describe exactly what happened. These are individuals who carried out an act of terrorism, and they later tried to justify that act of terrorism by invoking the religion of Islam in their own deviant view of it,” he said.

So, the Islamist Extremists that killed Hebdo and shot at the police, the very men that came out shouting “strike France and the Jews,” “Allah is the greatest”, "We have avenged the prophet Mohamed" and “Charlie is dead.” We aren't going to call them what they are?  IF they were "Christian zealots", 

I'm sure Obama and liberals wouldn't have a problem uttering the phrase, but since they are Islamists and they are killing in the name of his god, this is unacceptable in his.  However, he did say that we "would never be at war with Islam," and he's always kept his word to them. 

Critics of Obama have questioned his refusal to identify the terrorist actions as an act of radical Islamic terrorism. “You cannot win a battle against radical Islamic terrorism if you’re unwilling to utter the words ‘radical Islamic terrorism,'” Sen. Ted Cruz said last June.

What's his logic here? It's not as if I stopped calling my German Shepard a dog and start calling him a cat, or nothing at all, that suddenly it will make him not want to eat the mailman or strangers that walk along the back fence, clean himself, poop in a litter box, purr, meow and only want to eat cat food.

“[W]e have not chosen to use that label because it doesn’t seem to accurately describe what had happened,” Earnest said. Earnest explained that the White House didn’t want to be in a position of “legitimizing” an “illegitimate justification” for violent actions, calling the ideology of the terrorists a “distorted deviant view of Islam.”

He reminded reporters that reports suggested one of the victims of the terrorist attack in Paris was a Muslim as well as one of the hostages at the Kosher grocery store. Read more Breitbart

Denial won't fix the problem in our Country.  According to Pew findings, the survey finds that younger Muslim Americans – those under age 30 – are both much more religiously observant and more accepting of Islamic extremism than are older Muslim Americans and the polling does find pockets of support for extremism. Overall, just 5% of Muslim Americans express even somewhat favorable opinions of al Qaeda.  

However, when asked about "suicide bombings" they get confused, but scary answers.  Very few Muslim Americans – just 1% – say that suicide bombings against civilian targets are often justified to defend Islam; an additional 7% say suicide bombings are sometimes justified in these circumstances. Read entire Pew finding.  Now do you understand why there aren't "Moderate Muslim rallies" against extremists, in America? 

So, with this many Muslims in our own Country, who are silently in agreement with the extremist views, pattern of behavior and hatred, is it wise for this Administration to not call a duck a duck and just blissfully stick their head in the sand?Let the bleeding heart liberals and Isolationists bleed on ...