Obama Nails the Coffin shut for Future GOP Presidential Elections – Loophole for Illegal Immigrants Voting

By Elizabeth Nelson

Does anyone else think that Emperor Obama looks for all of the things he can’t legally do, and sets out to do exactly that; just to prove all of us Conservative “wing-bats” right?  Remember when us Right-Wing-Nuts were screaming, “this Amnesty is going to grant  illegal’s the right to US benefits, and the  right to vote in the next Democratic President, and all the libtards were calling us "crazy"? Guess what, thanks to Obama’s pen and phone, he’s just proven us wing-nuts right yet again.  It SUCKS being right.

President Obama’s temporary deportation amnesty will make it easier for illegal immigrants to improperly register and vote in elections, state elections officials testified to Congress on Thursday, saying that the driver’s licenses and Social Security numbers they will be granted create a major voting loophole.

While stressing that it remains illegal for noncitizens to vote, secretaries of state from Ohio and Kansas said they won’t have the tools to sniff out illegal immigrants who register anyway, ignoring stiff penalties to fill out the registration forms that are easily available at shopping malls, motor vehicle bureaus and in curbside registration drives. Read more Washington Times

So, Obama is illegally issuing Social Security cards and drivers licenses to these Illegals, and what do you ask, is going to keep them from registering to vote? Oh, because it’s against the law? They broke the law to come into this country, what makes us think they’ll abide by our laws now?  Don’t tell me that Obama didn’t do this with the sole purpose of having them do just that and registering to vote Demonrat in upcoming elections.  

We all know that the Democrats have been digging up dead people and busing in illegals to vote without Obama issuing them Unconstitutional Social Security numbers. Hell, Obama has an illegally obtained CT Social Security number, so this is right up his alley.  

However, this is just another unConstitutional slap to every American’s face. Remember, Obama had also promised that he wasn’t going to be giving them Citizenship benefits, and gullible lemmings that they are ate that lie up like all the rest. Can we say, paid Democrat votes? 

“They will be eligible to collect Social Security and Medicare benefits as well as claim a special tax break for low-income families,” the Congressional Budget Office said in an analysis Thursday. Read more  Washington Times

Not to mention "paid back refund taxes." Yeah, they'll get to suck up more from this Country, in earned income credits, for every child that they snuck across the border illegally and every "child they claim to have".  I'm amazed we aren't rewarding Criminals for breaking the law when they liberated the rich people from their possessions, when they robbed them. "We were just showing them what the poor and middle class feel like with only two tvs, not four, show mercy." This is liberal mentality, isn't it? "I'm not a drug dealer, I'm an undocumented pharmacist."   "I'm not a prostitute, I'm an undocumented sex therapist."

Matthew McConaughey's Side Income - "Pay to Hunt Fenced In, Seeded Deer"

By Elizabeth Nelson

Remember when Texas Cheerleader Kendall Jones caused a liberal shi* storm of controversy over her paid African wildlife hunting experience and the pictures she posted of it on her facebook page? 

She even eliciting death threats because of it.  Can you imagine if she had hunted these animals in a private fenced and human-fed wildlife-like sanctuary? Oh, who would do that? That's not sporting or even a challenge. Any Conservative would tell you, that's shooting "fish in a barrel," right, even the Wildlife Department would tell you seeding "baiting" a field for hunting purposes is against the law. 

However, that's exactly what is happening on liberal actor Matthew McConaughey's  22,000 acre property.  For the right price, McConaughey offers his friends and their guets a "hunting experience" to visitors in which they can roam the property and hunt whitetail deer. Guests at the LP Ranch can enjoy various amenities, including satellite TV, ping pong, shuffleboard, a pool table and a tavern.  

Really disappointed in Matthew McConnaughey, having a deer pen for people to hunt is just nasty. http://t.co/0VfHXY7fHW
— ☆ Doris McDay ☆ (@ThatDorisMcDay) February 4, 2015

Matthew McConaughey has a side business ... letting people onto his property to hunt caged-in animals, and it has enraged animal rights activists. Matt owns a ranch in Mertzon, Texas with his brother Mike. The ranch breeds and sells horses and cows.

The ranch also offers whitetail deer hunting ... where people can come to hunt deer that

can't run away. Hunters can actually stay on the property during thehunting trip ... there is food, a tavern, and other amenities.

As for the hunt ... people can go out during the day and shoot the deer. Someone connected with the ranch tells TMZ there are 22,000 acres for the animals to roam, but animal rights groups claim the deer hang by the feeding area, which makes them easy targets. Read more TMZ: 

The problem with McConaughey's "hunting experience" and the reason he has come under fire is because his guests are hunting “caged-in animals,” seeded, and “trapped deer kills” on the ranch he reportedly co-owns, not free-range and wild animals, like Kendall hand to track in the wild Safari.  

Can we say, "fish in a barrel?"   So, when will the death threats and the boycotts start against the ubber liberal McConaughey?  Oh, that's right, Conservatives must live by the "do as I say, not as I do" double standard.

Liberals: the "Tolerant" Buzz Kill Children's Fantasy Killers, "Bah Humbug, No Virginia, there's NO Santa Claus"

By Elizabeth Nelson

I'm curious, I know that the three wise men visited Jesus Christ around Christmas and that HE IS CHRISTMAS and Atheists and liberals hate that part of the word CHRISTmas, to the point of taking it out "Xmas" and forcing postal employees to say, "Happy Holidays," and making people sell, "holiday trees."  That being said, what does Santa Claus have to do with Jesus, in the entire "religious" scheme of things?

The War-on-Christmas has come to Massachusetts. It seems that Byam Elementary School in Chelmsford, MA has banned items related to Christmas, Hannukkah and especially Santa, because, "[Santa]It's sending the wrong message to our kids," said McMillan.

The report also related that a school committee member believes “the policy was likely enacted to prevent any child from feeling left out.”  In contrast, the report quotes Cullen who points out,“It's as if the schools are saying choice is a fundamental right except when it comes to celebrating our traditions which have religious roots."  

Liberals and Atheists are just buzz-kills that want to argue about things they don't believe in and ruin it for everyone.  They don't believe in Jesus Christ, and yet they want to argue about something they don't believe in.  I don't believe in the Vegan lifestyle, but you don't see me arguing with them and telling them the benefits of fish, red meat or only forcing them to eat what I eat and think what I think and believe my way is the best way to live.

On 14 Nov 09, lowellsun.com reported, that a PTO meeting on the issue “grew heated.”  In the report, McMillan related that “Red and green tissue paper to wrap presents was also crossed off the list because it looked too 'Christmasy.''


The report related that during the PTO debate, "One of the parents said, 'If we allow Santa, what do we say if a child brings in a swastika? Do we allow that too?' " McMillan said. "All I could think of was, are you kidding? You're comparing a Christmas ornament to a swastika? It seems as if reason is lost somewhere and I just hope we can find it again." 

Because Santa is really a Nazi in disguise and the Nazis of this day give presents to all of the boys and girls, instead of gassing them and killing them in their sleep.  

On 17 Nov 09, a Boston Herald editorial related that, “Byam Elementary School in Chelmsford is one of several area schools that raises money by setting up holiday gift shops. Parents donate trinkets and tchotchkes, which are then put on sale for a few days in December so the little kiddies can buy gifts for mom, dad and the sibs.

According to organizers in the Byam PTO, it’s one of their biggest fund raisers.”  The editorial goes on to relate that while other schools have no such restrictions, Byam Elementary prohibits anything related to the Christmas holiday.

The editorial quips, “To all the children at Byam Elementary: 'Happy Random Gift-Purchasing Non-Holiday!' “ 
On 3 Nov 09, the Catholic League posted an article with several examples of the 2009 “War on Christmas.” The examples range from the renaming of Christmas events and symbols or the prohibition of public displays to remove any reference to Christmas or observance of the nativity.

The article related, “The word 'Christmas' was deemed offensive. Instead, there will be a 'Holiday Tree.' The official line is that the 'Holiday Tree' is inclusive of Thanksgiving, Christmas, Hanukkah and New Year’s, though no one has ever heard of a 'Thanksgiving Tree,' 'Hanukkah Tree' or 'New Year’s Tree.' “ Read more Guardian

Why would the fat man cause liberal's heads to explode and cause them to not only ruin

what is usually the best part of a child's life but ruin the economic retail shopping patterns as well?  

Without Santa, there are no elves, Santa, reindeer, cookies, good-will, good-kids, etc. The holiday implodes, but thank you liberals, for your killing the holiday for all of us, you libtards sure know how to be an "open-minded" wet-blanket in a blizzard.

MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL, and to ALL a good week! :)

Society isn't Mute, They're Stupid - When Heroes Become Villains

By Elizabeth Nelson

Okay, I have to ask; social media being what it is, and computers being accessible to everyone, even open to the local bum at our local library who is this "voiceless person" everyone keeps talking about that they "must be the voice of those who don't have a voice."    It's not that the voiceless can't speak, it's that they won't.

Here in Jacksonville, FL, we have the stupid and the vocal spreading the same inaccurate "protest" fantasies that seem to be catching fire across the nation, but do they realize what chaos could grow from the wildfire they've started? 19 protesters were arrested, only 1 was a felony arrest because she struck an officer in the face and resisted arrest, as they blocked traffic on the Hart Bridge during rush hour traffic, because they "didn't like either grand jury verdict of Brown or Garner." 

Yet, their illegal protesting caused the police to now protect them from being killed by the quickly escalating road raging people that were trying to get across the bridge. What slays me is that people are illogical enough to sympathize with the criminal, not the cop trying to do their job.  No one stops to question, why didn't the EMT give Garner oxygen or his inhaler, didn't he ask for it? Garner wasn't DOA.

@carlokuhrt @RealRyanSipple @ElizabethNels0n shown more compassion for him after they had him on the ground. They were callous, but
— ibsharkbait (@ibsharkbait) December 9, 2014

No, now we should lower the bar and our guard and treat perps with kid gloves, if they don't want to cooperate and the timing is inconvenient, like this female cop did, right?

Or maybe Libertarians have something to their isolationist thinking and we should just let people settle their own drama and cops wouldn't have to deal with situations like this?

So now, NFL, NBA and the vocal members of society are sending a message to the criminals, that the bar has dropped, it's now socially acceptable to resist the police, and if they should happen to die in the process, not only will they not be held accountable for their illegal act, but society will protest in honor and will seek "justice" in their criminal martyrdom. 

In their solidarity, even in the spreading of their false narrative, they are telling the police they are supporting the criminals and telling the police that they are allowed to enforce all laws, to a point, and if the criminal doesn't "wish to acquiesce to their arrest invitation and peacefully go with them," oh, that's okay, they should come back another day and try again.

 

Now that the "Justice for thuggish criminals...", "protest against cops," "hands up don't shoot," "I can't breathe," fires have been started across this country, and cops have been put on notice with this false narrative propaganda who are you going to call when someone breaks into your home or someone shoots your 16-year-old black child, because you are the ones claiming it's "open season on blacks," not us. Ironically, those who don't fear the police have nothing to fear, and those that fear them are the ones that are the ones hiding their crap like cats in a litter box.

Sadly, such an instance came up this morning and our cops were called into action.  A 16-year-old black boy was shot to death, while waiting for the school bus, and one of our white cops, whom the protesters were protesting against just yesterday, "for equality," had to come out and file a report today.  This young child's mother now wants this cop to "find this child's killer,"  who is more than likely black, knowing the neighborhood this child was killed in.  

So, cops are all fine-and-good, when they are the "peace keepers" that are serving your needs and purposes? However, if they are the ones taking your son in for murdering one of your own, this isn't the "justice" you wanted?  Police aren't your servants, to be slapped around at will.  

They aren't here to be a pawn in our little dramas and  certainly don't have time to add more danger to their jobs by manipulating the law, "with conditions," as we see fit.  The law is the only thing they see in colors, that is black and white, everything else they see in living color. 

So if you need emergency assistance, you'd better call Al Sharpton (212) 690-3070 or Jesse Jackson (202) 393-7874. You know they love fires and would love to help you fan yours, because not every cop is not a bad cop, just like every black man is not a criminal, broad strokes with a wide brush can be dangerous, someone has to stop.  As King once said,  "Judge a man by the content of his character not by the color of his skin." 

Irony of Ironies: Ferguson Senator Nasheed - Avid Anti-Gun Legislator - Victim of Black-on-Black Crime

By Elizabeth Nelson

With a gun to her head, MO Senator, and self-proclaimed anti-gun Jamilah Nasheed was the victim of an attempted armed robbery in her own front yard, with no armed police officers around to come to her aid.  

Ironically, Senator Nasheed is a concealed Carry holder, but she was arrested carrying during the [civil disobedience] riots, while intoxicated and carrying a loaded 9mm and extra ammo. This is against all CCW laws, including MO law, no matter your race, creed, or sex.

Yet, she wants to take guns away from us law abiding citizens, who don't want to get drunk and engage in civil disobedience with our loaded weapons?  Most states won't even allow us to carry our loaded firearm into a bar or nightclub, people.

Missouri State Senator Jamilah Nasheed (D-5th Dist) has seen her name and image in the national news for her chants of "No Justice, No Peace!" at more than a few Ferguson, Missouri marches that accuse the local police department of overt racism by racially profiling and targeting young black males for harassment and arrest.

Yet the Saint Louis Democrat has found herself wishing a cop was nearby as she founder herself a victim of black-on-black crime, as reported by KTVO television of St. Louis on Nov. 22, 2014.

— Jamilah Nasheed (@SenatorNasheed) November 22, 2014

The irony of ironies is that an anti-gun legislator (and concealed carrier to boot) being held at gunpoint by a lawbreaker while she herself was breaking the law, packing heat while intoxicated and participating in Civil Disobedience just weeks before, isn't lost on any of us law-abiding concealed carriers.  However, we understand that the unlawful don't follow the laws, much like this 20-25 year old hooded black assailant that wanted the Senator's car keys.

Nasheed found herself confronted by a gun-wielding "black male, 20-25 years old, 120-130 lbs., 5’2″-5’3″, with a thin build, clean shaven and wearing a dark hooded sweatshirt" as she exited her car outside home located in St. Louis' West End. According to KTVO, "The suspect pointed a gun at Nasheed, demanding her keys. When she refused, he threatened to kill her. She still refused and told the man 'to do what he was going to do.' The suspect got back in the car, which drove away." Read more Examiner

Okay, so she didn't do what liberals tell us all to do which is, "don't fight or argue with the assailant, carry a whistle and give them whatever they want."  Liberals, they are so much fun, this is just another example of, "do as I say, not as I do, guns are great for me but not for you."  Hell, she doesn't even obey the law, as she participates in "Drunken, Armed Civil Disobedience."  

Someone really needs to tell the progressives that their time of relevance has passed and that this is NOT the 50s and 60s anymore.  Women and blacks are not being oppressed, NAACP has already been formed, and they can stop looking for that time machine, step out into the 21st century with the rest of us and stop dividing this country with their weak-minded excuses and nonsense. 

5 insanely Hilarious Democrat post-election meltdowns

By Elizabeth Nelson

Okay, I have to admit, when Obama got re-elected, I felt an overwhelming sense of gloom and doom, but I quickly got over it, pulled my bootstraps up and figured, heck we lived through Carter, we can get through whatever this divisive, American hating racist will throw at us, and so far I've been right.
Well, when I ran across these most hilarious and very liberally progressive Democrat post-election meltdowns, not only did I have to laugh I also had to shake my head, because I can see the utter brainwashing in their comments.  How can these people be THIS warped and not see how bad Obama's policies are for our Country and how far down he's dragged us?

Yet, they blame the Republicans for where we are, not Obama.  ZelDUH is obvious oblivious to the fact that the red states are in the black, while the blue states are in the red, so if we were all allowed to recede, not only would the blue states go bankrupt, but their crime rates would go through the roof (see Detroit as an example of what the blue states would quickly become) and their citizens would start trying to come over the wall into the Red States. However, I think CK John is onto something and Obama should run with it. **giggle**

I have to say, watching liberals throw a temper tantrum only makes the GOP victory taste even sweeter.

Of course, most liberals took to social media to vent their frustrations, publicizing their epic

meltdowns for the whole world to see and laugh at. Some of the best mental breakdowns came from the site “The Democratic Underground,” and the folks at The Daily Caller were kind enough to collect them in one long list.

Here are my top five favorites.

DebJ: “Tonight doesn’t make me wish I had quit smoking. An early death would be merciful compared to a long slow one with insufficient nutrition and no health care, which is what is coming up. I’m torn, can’t decide in which order to cry and vomit and get sick.”

FLyellowdog: ”This whole election is leaving me with some very scary feelings. And I’m simply sick…physically sick…and emotionally drained.”

Sammy750: “The GOP is the biggest scandal of the century. Huge voter suppression and fixing the voting machines so they didn’t register right. The GOP is the biggest fraud, AG Holder will be busy undoing all the GOP fraud wins”

Zelduh: “Can we PLEASE let them secede? I think it is time to acknowledge that uniting the North and the South is a three hundred fifty year-old failed experiment. Next time any political leader in the South mentions that they want to secede, we should jump at the opportunity to untangle the country from the Red states. This country cannot have clean air, water and earth in many states, because Republicans. This country cannot have science in many states, because Republicans. This country cannot have rational, thoughtful, logical gun regulations, because Republicans. Women cannot exercise control over their own bodies in many states, because Republicans.”

CK_John: “I think the President has to put resignation on the table and not give them the satisfaction of being impeached.”

Well, we can look forward to: unregulated banks, no health care, filthy air and oceans, and WAR, WAR AND MORE WAR. Thanks, folks!
— Bette Midler (@BetteMidler) November 5, 2014

All of the meltdowns and Demonrat temper tantrums can be seen here on the Daily Caller

Trick or Treat - Sexy Ebola - Symptom of a Diseased America?

By Elizabeth Nelson

I'm sitting here dumbfounded.  I've seen people poke fun at Politics and put on masks of past and present Presidents: Carter, Reagan, Clinton, Bush, and Obama for Halloween. We've all seen the typical horror costumes like Dracula, mummy and Frankenstein but Ebola?  How can sycophants even consider making light or try to "sexy-up" a disease that isn't just making people violently ill but is killing people by the thousands?

If Halloween is supposed to be spooky, at least some costumes worn this year by party-goers in the United States promise to be terrifying.  Some of the more ghoulish trick-or-treaters will be dressed as emergency responders to people sick with Ebola, head to toe in protective clothing, according to costume previews in social media.

Ghosts, vampires and fairy princesses will likely continue to be the most popular costumes for the Oct. 31 fancy dress party. But every year, it seems edgier costumes emerge from news headlines.

Costumes are meant to lampoon, "but the world is getting more serious. This is scary stuff," said Tony Bianchi, manager of New York Costumes in Manhattan.

In past years, the store has sold such ripped-from-the-headlines costumes as White House intern Monica Lewinsky, Princess Diana after her fatal car crash and the Chilean miners trapped underground in 2010.  Read more Reuters

The Ebola virus that has killed nearly 4,000 people in west Africa seems to be this year's favorite among some planning for Halloween.  Even Social media know this is wrong, in so many ways, and is sounding off:

If you see someone dressed as Ebola this Halloween, punch them in self-defense.
— Sam Kalidi (@samkalidi) October 29, 2014

"Sexy Ebola Nurse Costumes" are actually a thing. Misogynistic issues aside, thousands of people are dying...
— Joe Arnold (@JoeArnold20_2) October 27, 2014

Perhaps we should be proactive and create a quarantine for these mentally stupid people, that are obviously showing outward symptoms of their diseased brain.  God forbid they infect others.

Newtown CT Commission: "Homeschooling Kids Could Lead to Homicidal Killers"

By Elizabeth Nelson

Well, I guess Newton doesn't have enough to keep them busy or to spend their money on. I can understand how they could want to prevent another Sandy Hook, but they are going about it in all the wrong ways. 

Have you heard what this room of rocket scientists came up with?  What they truly believe is going to spot the sociopath and homicidal killer and prevent another mass killing before they take the shot? Keeping a "tighter scrutiny" and a close eye on Home Schooled children.

A 16-member commission of educators, local and state officials and behavioral experts assembled by Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy after the Sandy Hook Elementary massacre is calling for more oversight of homeschooling.

Sandy Hook School SignMalloy “charged the panel with making recommendations to reduce the risk of future tragedies,” according to the New Haven Register. Its chief recommendation is “tighter scrutiny of home-schoolers … to prevent an incident such as the December 2012 slaughter of 20 first-graders and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown,” the Connecticut Post reports.

Really? This is what they came up with?  They don't have enough to worry about, like drugs, gangs or David, the little 12-year-old boy, who took his dad's gun to school, no, not to kill anyone but himself, because he was being bullied mercilessly, let alone the other guns that they now have to worry about watching out for.

“She mentioned she wound up home-schooling him because she battled with the school district,” Nancy’s sister-in-law Marsha told ABC in 2012.

But wait, Adam was already in the system to begin with, so he was already a screwed-up product of the public school system, long before his mom started to "home-school" him.

“The purpose of this recommendation is to make sure that kids get what kids need. If they have needs that aren’t being addressed, just because the parent has chosen to remove them from the school setting… their needs are still going to be met,” Kathleen Flaherty, staff attorney for Statewide Legal Services of Connecticut, said of the recommendations, according to CTnewsjunkie.com.

Many parents make that decision for very valid reasons. Should that make them subject to additional governmental scrutiny, as the panel is suggesting?

Because if the act of homeschooling and the perceived lack of governmental oversight is to blame, how does Sandy Hook Advisory Panel explain way these public school students:

* On March 21, 2005, Red Lake Senior High School student Jeffrey Weise killed five students, one teacher, one security guard, and then committed suicide.

* On April 20, 1999, Columbine High School students Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold killed 12 students and one teacher, and wounded 21 others before committing suicide.

I'd like to add a little note here, something that "gun-ban nuts" hate; this school shooting was one of TWENTY school shootings that happened during Diane Feinstein's original assault weapons ban.  So, gun-bans work to stop murder, rape, and robberies? Yeah, as well as they do in Prison.  Oh, maybe those inmates were home schooled.

* On March 5, 2001, student Charles Andrew Williams killed two students and wounding 13 others at Santana High School in California.

* On February 27, 2012, TJ Lane walked into the Chardon High School cafeteria and fired into a group of students sitting at a lunch table. Three students died in the attack. His “emotional disability” was such that he wore a t-shirt with “Killer” scrawled on it to his sentencing. Continue Reading EAGnews


Sadly, instead of using common sense and the education system to their advantage, they'd rather alienate a small percentage of their school population and actually empower the school bullies.  Wouldn't we think it would be in their best interest to empower their students and faculty by educating them to watch for the red flag signs and to alert others when they see them so that the proper people can stop the student before they have a chance to act on their desire to hurt themselves or others?  No, I guess this would be too easy.

Jesus on Trial - NY Times Shuns Best Selling Christian Author & Attorney David Limbaugh

By Elizabeth Nelson

Liberals love to parrot that Christian values are not being oppressed, but isn't that the only thing that is oppressed today, when even Obama says "we are no longer a Christian Nation." When he, not by his words but by his very actions has chosen his "favorite faith," his Muslim faith.  He frees the most dangerous in Gitmo, the Taliban five for a deserter Muslim. 

However, Obama refuses to free our Marine, "left behind" in a Mexican jail or lift a finger to try to free a Christian Pastor in Iran. So, is it any wonder that the world, and even our Country, is following Obama's lead - as is the custom when America sets the path, in persecuting Christians and Jesus' name? Now the NY Times is Ostracizing a bestselling Christian author and Attorney David Limbaugh, because he's putting Jesus on Trial before the world?

The New York Times has excluded David Limbaugh’s new book “Jesus on Trial: A Lawyer Affirms the Truth of the Gospel,” from it bestseller list despite sales figures superior to several books currently on the list.

The book’s publisher, Regnery Publishing, told WND the exclusion of Limbaugh’s book from the Sept. 28 print hardcover bestseller list reflects ideological bias against conservative and Christian titles. Continue reading WND

excerpt from the book:

From popular culture to the halls of academia, Christianity is under attack. The Old Testament's accounts of history are often dismissed as myths, while the gospels are frequently derided as a fairy tale. But the critics' arguments are far weaker than they first appear.

In "Jesus on Trial," New York Times bestselling author David Limbaugh applies his lifetime of legal experience to a unique new undertaking: making a case for the gospels as hard evidence of the life and work of Jesus Christ. Limbaugh, a practicing attorney and former professor of law, approaches the canonical gospels with the same level of scrutiny he would apply to any legal document and asks all the necessary questions about the story of Jesus told through Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. Limbaugh knows the skeptics' arguments well 

TYVM RT @NolteNC: Last tweet fer real: already addicted, @DavidLimbaugh. Have a house to paint. You're not helping. pic.twitter.com/VIVLqNdIZq
— David Limbaugh (@DavidLimbaugh) August 30, 2014

– because he used to be a skeptic himself. In these pages he describes his own faith journey to Christianity, explaining in moving detail the arguments, evidence and biblical passages that caused him to embrace Jesus Christ as his Lord and Savior.

In this book Limbaugh shows:

• Abundant evidence that the Bible is the most historically reliable text among all ancient writings
• Why the gospels' account of Jesus' resurrection is far more convincing than any other explanation of His fate
• The Bible's astonishing feats of prophecy and the skeptics' feeble attempts to dismiss them
• How the critics' arguments against Christianity are infected with ideological bias
• The increasing archaeological evidence affirming the biblical account of history
• How Christianity is not only compatible with scientific methods, but was instrumental in the birth of modern science

Ultimately, Limbaugh concludes that the words Christians have treasured for centuries stand up to his exhaustive inquiry – including his examination of historical and religious evidence beyond the gospels – and thereby affirm Christian faith, spirituality and tradition.

 Part personal testimony, part Christian apologetic, part informative evaluation of the facts and part primer on theology, "Jesus on Trial" provides Christians with a remarkable reaffirmation of their faith – while offering skeptics a challenge that cannot be ignored. Read more WND Superstore

It's as simple as the liberal "tolerant, open minded" Left way or the other way, the Conservative Right way. 

The liberal "tolerant, open minded" way or the other way says:

 "Do as we say, think as we think, say as we say and everyone will be happy. However, if

Photo credit: Compliments of the Exceptionally gifted @GlennFo

you go against our collective hive, and try to think on your own and use common sense, we'll call you, 'narrow-minded, racist, domestic terrorists and dangerous.'"
  

The other side, the Conservative, right leaning way says:

In a nutshell: here's Jesus, who loved you enough to die for us all and our sin. He paid for it so we wouldn't have to go to hell. 

God loved us so that "when we were in our sin
Christ Jesus came to die for us." Romans 5:8

"for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God," Romans 3:23

"For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in
Christ Jesus our Lord." Romans 6:23

Second Corinthians 5:21 says, "He who knew no sin became sin for us, that
we may be made the righteousness of God through Him."

Watch a visual example of my point, as Frank Turek (author of I Don't Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist) answers a young atheist's (Carter's) questions on morality, atheism and the existence of God, Heaven and Hell:

How can you receive God's free gift of love and life?

"that if you confess with your mouth Jesus as Lord, and believe in your heart
that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved; for with the heart a
person believes, resulting in righteousness, and with the mouth he
confesses, resulting in salvation." Romans 10:9-10


A person receives God's free gift of love and life by placing faith in Jesus 

Christ. To believe is simply to take God at His word. With our heart 
(whole believing) we believe that Jesus is God's Son who died for our sin 
on the cross and arose from the grave to live in us as Savior and Lord.

To believe in Jesus will result in confessing that faith with one's mouth.

Do you acknowledge that you are a sinner?

Do you believe by faith that Jesus, God's Son, died for your sin on the cross?

Will you now confess Him as your Savior and Lord?


"for Whoever will call on the name of the Lord will be saved." Romans 10:13
Will you now call upon Jesus to save you from your sin so that you
can know God's love and forgiveness?

Pray like this: "Dear God, I confess that I am a sinner, and I am sorry. I need
a Savior. I know I cannot save myself. I believe by faith that Jesus, your
Son, died on the cross to be my Savior. I believe He arose from the grave
to live as my Lord. I turn from my sin. I ask You, Lord Jesus, to forgive my
sin and come into my heart. I trust you as my Savior and receive you as
my Lord. Thank you, Jesus, for saving me."

When anyone calls on the Lord in this manner, that one is saved according
to God's Word. If you pray a prayer of repentance and faith, you are saved.
You have God's word on it.

If you have prayed this prayer to receive Christ as your Lord and Savoir, why
not record your decision to follow Jesus as follows. Often times, a good place
to write this would be inside the cover of your bible:

Believing by faith that God loves me and sent His Son, Jesus Christ, to die
for my sin and arise from the grave to live in me, I, _______, do this day,
 ________, repent of my sin and accept Jesus Christ as my personal Lord
and Savior. According to the promise of God in Romans 10:13, I have
called upon His name and have His word for the assurance of my salvation.The difference is after you've heard about Jesus, you have the choice to walk away and either accept him as your Savior or don't, it's your CHOICE. We care if you accept him or not, but we aren't going to think ill of you if you don't and we aren't going to take your head if you choose to walk away from Christ. 

It's about a relationship with Christ, that's all he or any of us wants, it's not a cult that we want you to join. The choice is between Heaven or Hell, it's your CHOICE which you're going to walk into. Neither we or Christ is going to force you to choose. He a "loving God," who gave you "free will."