By Elizabeth Nelson
There is a difference between a "Political anti-war plan" and a "War Strategy," just as there is a major difference between a world leader and the spineless occupying terrorist-sympathizer that we have planning our fate.
There is a difference between a "Political anti-war plan" and a "War Strategy," just as there is a major difference between a world leader and the spineless occupying terrorist-sympathizer that we have planning our fate.
Remember what it was like to have
a steel-backed leader, that wasn't afraid to look our enemy in the eye and tell
him, "NO, you CAN'T do that, WE WON'T allow it!" Because he knew that
bowing down to them would change America as we knew it.
I'm sure you're like me and have heard someone
say, "I can do whatever I want, it's my decision and my choices, because
it's my life and it's not hurting anyone but me and I'll deal with the
consequences of my choices." However, that's not always the case.
Unfortunately, we are
about to find out first hand that we don't have to make the choice to
live the consequences of someone else's decision. Obama's
political decision of wanting to appease his anti-war base is going to blow up
in his face.
If we
aren't willing to call this a "war" and send our men to die, why
should they and sacrifice their men? They aren't deceived, they have clear eyes and understand
this isn't political or a game of "win-lose-or draw", with ISIS, and they will fight the war against ISIS without the USA, when their time comes.
However, Obama is the only one that is playing a "political" game here.
No comments:
Post a Comment