Difference Between a "Political Anti-War Plan" and an ISIS War Strategy

By Elizabeth Nelson

There is a difference between a "Political anti-war plan" and a "War Strategy," just as there is a major difference between a world leader and the spineless occupying terrorist-sympathizer that we have planning our fate.

Remember what it was like to have a steel-backed leader, that wasn't afraid to look our enemy in the eye and tell him, "NO, you CAN'T do that, WE WON'T allow it!" Because he knew that bowing down to them would change America as we knew it.

I'm sure you're like me and have heard someone say, "I can do whatever I want, it's my decision and my choices, because it's my life and it's not hurting anyone but me and I'll deal with the consequences of my choices."  However, that's not always the case.  

Unfortunately, we are about to find out first hand that we don't have to make the choice to

live the consequences of someone else's decision. Obama's political decision of wanting to appease his anti-war base is going to blow up in his face.   

If we aren't willing to call this a "war" and send our men to die, why should they and sacrifice their men?  They aren't deceived, they have clear eyes and understand this isn't political or a game of "win-lose-or draw", with ISIS, and they will fight the war against ISIS without the USA, when their time comes. However, Obama is the only one that is playing a "political" game here.

Gohmert: "Terrorist [ISIS] could Come into the US from our Texas Border"

By Elizabeth Nelson

It is a wonderful time to be in America, we have never been more safe under Obama's observant leadership, healthcare costs are going down, the war on terror is and the war on terror and the war in Iraq is finally over and our border has never been more secure. Welcome to the Liberal mindset, what what our MSM is pushing for our Empiric leader. 

So won't everyone be shocked when Gohmert's warning comes to fruition? 

On the phone Henry Cueller (D-TX): (Anyone wonder why he doesn't agree that ISIS won't come from his "secure" border?)

"The FBI director previously said...that there were people from terrorist countries who were assuming Hispanic names, and learning a few words of Spanish, and coming in,"

"The FBI director himself testified to that before Congress. So we know that this kind of thing has been going on--Governor Perry isn't saying anything that's new, it just takes a little while for the mainstream to catch up."

Congressman Cueller: "Is this a possibility? Of course, there's always a possibility," 

"We have to be ready. Right now there's no indication, but we have to be ready for anything."

The congressman did add that more recently, Marine General John Kelly, the Commander of South Command, testified before the House and Senate this year "that the penetration of our Southern border by criminal cartels, as well as terrorist organizations, poses, in his words, "an 'existential threat the United States."  

We have to love Democrats that speak out of both sides of their mouth.

However, Congressman Cueller, is just another delusional Democrat trying to protect his own butt, in Texas, while pushing Obama's, "the borders are safe and secure" agenda. 

Even according to the USTBC report, after collecting data for a year, under the U.S. Terrorism Border Crossing Dataset, and  tried to warn the White House, that 29 different terrorist countries of origin attempted to enter the US at 22 different ports of entry and 87% of them were successful.

So, I know his warning won't come as any shock to the rest of us, especially when we already know that the MS 13 gang, a hyper-violent el Salvadorian gang-the reason why the people from El-Salvador were looking for asylum here, trying to escape the violence there-managed to make their way over the border and made their way into our Country and are now in Texas. is in Texas.  

We all need to take this warning seriously, as ISIS has already put us on warning, that they are coming for us, and we already know we have sympathizer nuts in this country without ISIS walking effortlessly across our porous borders. Congratulations, Obama, you have not only left the door open for another 9/11 attack, but the windows and a welcome mat too.

CNN Questions calling ISIS "Evil"? WHAT World do They Live in?

By Elizabeth Nelson

Wow, I know this really shouldn't surprise me, coming from a liberal rag that is known for keeping the minds of obamazombies numb, but CNN ran an editorial yesterday morning from James Dawes, the director in Human Rights at some Minnesota college, who really questioned whether "evil" should be used to describe ISIS.

In what liberal world are we actually debating this?  His point: "Evil" is the strongest word we can find to use that motivates ourselves to kill others and it also stops us from thinking. 

Dawes' inspirational though came from two sources:  an editorial from the Wall Street Journal, which asserted the, "Like every evil in human history, ISIS will stop only when it is forced to stop. This means only when enough of its fanatics have been killed", and a tweet from National Review Online's Jonah Goldberg: 

People looking to put ISIS in "context" desperately avoid most obvious context. They're evil. They do obviously evil things for evil ends.

— Jonah Goldberg (@JonahNRO) August 20, 2014

His point:

“But if we’ve learned anything as a nation since our “shock and awe” campaign in Iraq, it is this: While invasions and bombing can be effective in the short term, they are not durable solutions to terror-based violence.”

“The fact is, there are few things more dangerous now than allowing ourselves to think this way.”

“To resist ISIS and, perhaps more importantly, the larger social forces it represents, the U.S. will need more than a collective psychological readiness to injure, and more than bombs.”

“Nonetheless, trying to understand evil is an offense. It is an offense to everything we hold dear, because understanding — that is, true and effective understanding — must bring us close to the other, must help us see the world through their eyes.”

My Point:

IF we learn anything, as a nation, to go back to pre-9/11 mentality and thinking of every terrorists group and terror attack as a "criminal act" instead of a "terrorist attack" puts our Country in a horrifically vulnerable state, and ISIS could give a crap if we label their soulless, celebratory beheading of men, women, and children "Evil" "criminal" or "Jayvee" as long as we continue to underestimate them and allow Obama to hit the golf course and do nothing.

The fact that this libtard thinks we need to "resist ISIS" rather than annihilating ISIS and obliterating them from the face of this planet is more dangerous than considering then "evil."  

I'm sure no one else has missed the small fact that they've gone from a "terrorist group" to a "terrorist army" in excess of 17,000 and has captured 28 tanks, and has downed 3 helicopters - but "al Qaeda is decimated and Bin Laden is dead," and Obama is being prepped for going back to "war."  But wait, we're hearing this from everyone BUT Obama.

The fact that we've learned nothing from the "evil," horrific events of our past, only means we're doomed to repeat them. It's not that we don't know evil when we see it, because if we look, we know it's there, like a fart in church. "By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thorn bushes, or figs from thistles?" (M T 7:16)  We just need the courage to go against the collective hive and name it when we see it is.