By Elizabeth Nelson
Wow, I know this really shouldn't surprise me, coming from a liberal rag that
is known for keeping the minds of obamazombies numb, but CNN ran an editorial
yesterday morning from James Dawes, the director in Human Rights at some
Minnesota college, who really questioned whether "evil" should be
used to describe ISIS.
In what liberal world are we actually
debating this? His point:
"Evil" is the strongest word we can find to use that motivates
ourselves to kill others and it also stops us from thinking.
Dawes' inspirational though came from two
sources: an editorial from the Wall Street Journal,
which asserted the, "Like every evil in human history, ISIS will stop
only when it is forced to stop. This means only when enough of its fanatics
have been killed", and a tweet from National Review Online's Jonah
Goldberg:
His
point:
“But
if we’ve learned anything as a nation since our “shock and awe” campaign in
Iraq, it is this: While invasions and bombing can be effective in the short
term, they are not durable solutions to terror-based violence.”
“The fact is, there are few things more dangerous now
than allowing ourselves to think this way.”
“To resist ISIS and, perhaps more importantly, the larger
social forces it represents, the U.S. will need more than a collective
psychological readiness to injure, and more than bombs.”
“Nonetheless, trying to understand evil is an offense. It
is an offense to everything we hold dear, because understanding — that is, true
and effective understanding — must bring us close to the other, must help us
see the world through their eyes.”
My
Point:
IF we learn anything, as a nation, to go back to pre-9/11
mentality and thinking of every terrorists group and terror attack as a "criminal
act" instead of a "terrorist attack" puts our Country in a horrifically
vulnerable state, and ISIS could give a crap if we label their soulless, celebratory
beheading of men, women, and children "Evil" "criminal" or
"Jayvee" as long as we continue to underestimate them and allow Obama
to hit the golf course and do nothing.
The fact that this libtard thinks we need to
"resist ISIS" rather than annihilating ISIS and obliterating
them from the face of this planet is more dangerous than considering then
"evil."
I'm sure no one else has missed the small fact that they've gone from a
"terrorist group" to a "terrorist army" in excess of 17,000
and has captured 28 tanks, and has
downed 3 helicopters - but "al Qaeda is decimated and
Bin Laden is dead," and Obama is being prepped for going back to
"war." But wait, we're hearing
this from everyone BUT Obama.